Kate Chopin’s “The Awakening” and shadow feminism

In this post I make an argument that Kate Chopin’s novella “The Awakening” is an example of the shadow or anti-social feminism that Halberstam explicates. The Awakening has long been a favorite novel of mine for reasons that I could only vaguely articulate before reading this chapter from The Queer Art of Failure. There are many narratives I am drawn to that seem to follow under this category of “shadow feminism” and they are always narratives that I feel fairly defensive of as they are often polarizing because they fail in interesting, or disappointing, depending on your views, ways. Briefly, “The Awakening” (published in 1899) is about a woman who leaves her husband and children to pursue an independent and reclusive life as a painter. While she is in transition a younger man whom she had a romantic affair with returns to ask her to marry him. She refuses marriage because of her ideals of independence and autonomy. After a night of existential anguish she realizes that her desire is doomed, her desire to be with Robert is overwhelming but at the same time being with him would mean losing her independence. In the morning she drowns herself in the sea in response to this irreconcilable dilemma.

Obviously, this ending is frustrating to any reader whether their bias is to be sympathetic toward a feminist character or not. Edna cruelly leaves her children motherless, and fails to create the alternative life she dreamed of. Instead, she gives up. There is probably no bigger indication of failure in our society than a selfishly motivated suicide. Edna’s suicide is an epitomization of the “complete dismantling of self” that Halberstam describes (124). Halberstam identifies shadow feminist texts as texts that “refuse to think back through the mother, they actively and passively lose the mother, abuse the mother, love, hate, and destroy the mother” to the end of dismantling the patriarchal systems of tradition and to unbecome woman (125). The Awakening breaks the mother connection in two ways connected to her final act, by first having Edna, as a mother herself, permanently annihilate the bond with her children (whom she describes as “antagonists” that “sought to drag her into the soul’s slavery for the rest of her days” (212)) and secondly by disappointing the traditional, hoped-for outcome that Edna would successfully follow in the footsteps of Mademoiselle Reisz, a spinster and talented musician who serves as Edna’s originally inspiration and guide and symbolic mother.

Halberstam refers to the “fantasy of an active, autonomous, self-activating individualism” that motivates the forms of prescriptive feminism we are familiar with that they view as inevitably playing into patriarchy and colonialism (130). Edna perverts this ideal of agency and individuality by using her will to self annihilate and unbecome woman. She realizes that as a woman in her particular social context, there is no choice that she could make that would result in fulfillment. If she chooses love, she chooses to submit to the patriarchal form of love as Robert and her society have defined it and lose her independence. If she chooses to follow in her mother-figure’s footsteps and lead a life of reclusion, disdained and isolated by others, she gives up on love. She can see no way out: either way she would be led into a role created for her by patriarchy, as either a married woman or a lonely spinster. The only agency Edna can enact is to refuse to choose one or the other and refuse to participate altogether.

This novel also carries with it implications of aesthetic failure and personal failure. The ending disappoints the sympathetic reader’s expectations and hopes for Edna and comes as a cruel shock. One could even read the ending as anti-feminist, presenting a woman attempting to live life on her own terms as a doomed project. But I think this reading is to assume that all feminist narratives have to propose a hopeful alternative even if it is a fantasy. Kate Chopin’s personal and professional reputation were ruined for writing the book; she was prevented from publishing again and died five years later in relative obscurity.


One thought on “Kate Chopin’s “The Awakening” and shadow feminism”

  1. hayleykboyd, I enjoyed your analysis of Kate Chopin’s work regarding shadow feminism. Though I haven’t read The Awakening yet, you explained it well enough for me to see your parallels to Halberstam’s theory. I will say that I am familiar with a few of Chopin’s short stories and came to find out that her biographical profile is close to some of these themes. If anything, the line you included where Edna calls her children “antagonists…sought to drag her into soul’s slavery for the rest of her days”—makes me want to read this piece even more. I think that is an incredibly perverse statement for a mother to express about her own children (albeit understand-ish-able), but then again—I’ve already read a story of her’s wherein the protagonist has to suppress her happiness when she is given the news that her husband has died—so I am already on board.

    I must admit, Halberstam’s mention of ‘erasure’ was the first time I’d heard that term. Previously, I’d only heard that term as the name of a hip, queer band from the 80’s. This idea of disappearing from the conventional gender role of woman is powerful, and to think that Chopin was creating characters/narratives where this kind of thing would play out is ahead of its time, definitely.

    After reading Helmers’s piece yesterday and becoming aware of the idea of paranoid readings, I wonder if you could apply it here, both in your breakdown, and how people have focused mainly on the negative affects of this subversive novella. It seems to me that viewing Edna’s character as seeing “no way out” from the patriarchy would be creating a paranoid reading. Your main point though, was excellently articulated in seeing that these doomed readings of Chopin’s work fails us as readers because it is “to assume that all feminist narratives have to propose a hopeful alternative even if [they are] a fantasy.” I think your point sheds light on how this proves to be a flawed way of approaching the text—just because women are the main characters there should be a happy ending? You may agree with me in resisting that idea. Interesting work.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s