Some possible prompts for your first blog posting

Your first blog posting is due by the end of the day on 13 January. It should address the reading from Jack Halberstam’s The Queer Art of Failure (you may, if you like, put that reading into dialogue with some of the excerpts we read in class on Tuesday, but that is not required). Below are some prompts you may consider while writing your posting, but you are not limited to these. If you’d like to come up with a topic of your own, feel free. Just make sure you cite specific claims/language from the reading that you can use to develop arguments and critical questions. You can (and should) cite those claims parenthetically by page number, like this: “refusal of identity” (132). Feel free to include images, links, etc. using the text editor–it’s pretty user-friendly–but don’t substitute pretty pictures for good reading and writing.

Finally: about “Tags.” Please append two or three tags to your blog post. When you click the button to write a blog, there will be a menu on the left of your screen that says “Categories & Tags.” A tag might be a specific concept or keyword from the reading (“negative affects,” “shadow feminism,” “legibility,” “low theory,” “suspect memorialization” . . .?), a specific theoretical framework (“queer theory,” “disability studies,” whatever), or something else.

I want to encourage you to find a tag that pushes beyond the obvious (I’d avoid “failure,” for example–too easy!), but that is broad enough that future bloggers will be able to reuse the tag.

Now, some prompts to get the ball rolling:

  • What is Halberstam doing with the concept of “low theory,” or positioning “low theory” against “high theory”? How is low theory related to the question of “failure” generally, and/or to the political questions Halberstam’s analysis asks?
  • What is the form of “masochistic passivity” that Halberstam endorspharrell-esquirees, and what is supposed to be radical or critical about it? How does it feed into Halberstam’s analysis of Jamaica Kincaid’s novel–or, if you haven’t read that novel, can you think of a different literary text to which it might apply?
  • What does Halberstam mean by the word “queer”? How does Halberstam want to propose “failure” as an approach to literature/culture that has specific relevance for queer or non-normative sexualities or “alternative political formations” (19)?
  • How do you assess Halberstam’s claims about pedagogy (teaching/learning), either on intellectual grounds or on political grounds (or both)?
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s